In defense of Nana Aba Anamoah: Nobody announces a prank

For the record, TV3’s Nana Aba Anamoah is not my friend. We’ve met, but we’ve never shared a meal or gossip before. Still, I have seen her evolution from a newscaster to a top presenter, and I like her. I love the spunk, wit and the verve she brings to her shows. Our shows are on at the same time, so I don’t get to watch her as much as I’d like. When I’m able to catch it, I always get a good laugh and learn a thing or two about her guests.

Her interview with the NDC General Secretary, Johnson Asiedu Nketia after his ‘women’s winter coat’ debacle blew me away. It was the most relaxed I had seen General Mosquito during an interview. She made him so comfortable, he dished and said things he usually wouldn’t. She always seems to have that question – the kind, every journalist would love to ask but is afraid to.

When I heard that she had presented someone’s pictures on Twitter as her own, I was surprised and disturbed. Surprised because she can afford to make the trip and see a game. I didn’t understand how she didn’t think someone would find out. She is Nana Aba, loud supporter of Manchester United on Twitter, fierce troll of terrible teams, a fantastic presenter people hate to love and a woman unafraid to speak up.

She says it was all a prank. And I believe her. I think that it was a prank that wasn’t allowed to mature. The word plagiarism has been used to describe her actions.

This is apparently a misunderstanding. I was confused too. Nana Aba cannot be accused of plagiarism because she was given the pictures by one of the parties who were at the stadium. She did not photoshop and insert herself into the pictures. She didn’t make money from the picture. She only tweeted the images with comments.

The question is, does she deserve to be sanctioned by her employers? Yes. Since some of the ire was thrown at TV3, they have every right to sanction her. Were TV3’s sanctions appropriate? Nope.

The sanctions were harsh, unfair and ill-timed. Nana Aba had explained and apologised profusely too. The woman had been trolled for days by folks who missed her point – that was enough punishment.

If TV3 felt embarrassed as their statement claimed, it could have sanctioned her and issued a statement without telling the world. She is one of their top presenters, whose loyalty has attracted enemies for her, (That nkontomire comment was not made in a vacuum) they didn’t have to betray or humiliate her like that.

The station’s statement said: “After preliminary investigations internally, and by TV3’s own commitment to the highest level of professionalism, Management has decided to take Nana Aba Anamoah off air until further notice.”

After the backlash, she does need time off -air – to breathe – and to allow her tormentors to move on. And they were until the TV3 announcement, which boggles the mind. Why make a public statement when you have not established anything against her.

The rash announcement was just excessive – almost sounds like someone in management wanted to shred every ounce of credibility she had left. Credibility is everything in her work as a journalist, and you do not touch it until you know something terrible has been done.

What happened on social media was not terrible. It’s not like she made up quotes or concocted a story like that other TV3 male journalist who deceived the whole country with a statement purported to be from the Flagstaff House about the intention to convert portions of the seat of government into a zoo.

I wonder if she was quickly dropped because she is a woman because there were no public statement or sanctions for some of the abominable transgressions of male journalists and presenters committed? That won’t be much of a shock after all Victoria Hammer was fired for gossiping while Baba Jamal kept his job. Baba Jamal was heard on a leaked tape telling officials to lie.

Women get the rawest deals when they stumble. Nana Aba is being served a considerable portion of that. She does nothing but has fun on Twitter. Her handle changes as Manchester United acquires new players. Nana Aba doesn’t use her account for any serious conversation or for TV3 work – mostly, it’s football and lifestyle. Undoubtedly someone in management was aware.

To turn around and say: “We expect guardians of our brand, particularly employees who we entrust to deliver content on air to our viewers, to ascribe to the company’s values, whatever they are,” is just laughable. If you ignore the trolls who didn’t know the full story, Nana Aba Anamoah has not done anything she doesn’t already do on Twitter.

If anyone erred, it is the TV3 management. Everyone knows this about pranks – you do not know you’re being pranked until you’re told. The TV3 management should know this, Ghanaians fell for the network’s April Fool’s Day prank – which interestingly was about Nana Aba Anamoah leaving the network.

Nana Aba Anamoah was clearly misunderstood by the public. Her employers should have stood by her and helped her clear it all up. It is not too late to remedy the situation. She has been wronged, and the management together with the board should fix this. Promptly!

They can begin with an apology – that statement was terrible and a betrayal.


2 thoughts on “In defense of Nana Aba Anamoah: Nobody announces a prank”
  1. While I do agree that TV 3’s reactions can be considered extreme and over the top, there are some misleading facts that you may be unaware of that I’d just like to point out

    1. The ones trolling her the hardest, indeed the ones who started the twitter hash tag and the memes, where those whose pictures she had borrowed. It makes very little sense in my mind to borrow pictures from a ‘friend’ only for that friend and his other colleagues to turn around and humiliate you in such a manner. She still hasn’t indicated who really sent her the pics.

    2. Her initial reaction was not to apologize. Her first tweet after the incident started to unravel was ‘you people play too much 😂😂’. She came out 2 days after this (and 3 days after the issue started) to state that it had all been a prank. Again, in my mind, if I was trying to prank someone and something like this started, I’d have immediately come out to say that this was a prank, and made the involvement of my conspirators known.

    Yes, the extreme measures to ensure that she be punished and (more disturbingly humiliated) in such a manner, are certainly not excusable. there is clearly something going in behind the scenes we don’t know about

    But, I believe, it is possible to have expressed a feminist viewpoint on the situation without seeking to paint this as simple prank gone wrong. I don’t like the fact that men get away with stunts like this, but that doesn’t mean everyone is overreacting to a minor issue here. It is the a me attitude & excuse used by politicians that irks me and countless others including yourself. (ie. If this had been a mistake by Member of Parliament, this would be a piece by someone else about how, while the Majority so and so had made a mistake, no one said anything when the minority so & so did this. Catch my drift?)

    I respect your opinions and feelings on this matter and suspect that TV 3 executives may be using this as an excuse to get rid of her. But ultimately, rushing to defend someone without the future facts weakens your stance and provides fodder for YOUR trolls who would love for you to receive similar treatment.

    Ended up longer than I intended, but there you go. Here’s hoping everyone, my self included, learns the social media lessons inherent in this situation.

  2. I agree that the punishment meted out to her seems rash and harsh but Nana Aba has a herself to blame in all this as a journalist her job was to be honest and truthful in any information that she delivered or shared to her followers something she failed woefully to do had funny face than this he would have been permitted and forgiven cos he is a comedian after all and his primary job is to make us laugh whiles participating in some silly antics. Nana Aba on the other hand is someone we should take seriously because of the nature of her job so for her to actually go to the extent of painstakingly photoshopping a picture, is nothing short of a scandal and her reputation will take a serious dent. The question begs that will she have ever told the truth had the original pictures not come out? Why did she take a long time to actually muster a reply? Why did she block some followers of hers on twitter when they dared to troll her? Are these the hallmarks of someone who needs defending? Part of growing up is taking responsibilities for ones actions ie for every action there would be a definite consequence. She must therefore lay in the bed she chose to make.

Leave a Comment